On the suggestion of expatriation, the has it’ s own problems as spelled out in the following link:

http://www.withersworldwide.com/news-publications/324/exit-tax-u-s-expatriates-to-become-law.aspx

Exit Tax for U.S. Expatriates to Become Law
28 May 2008
New rules will impose tax on expatriates and withholding requirements on trustees

The horror here, if I read the article correctly, is that a US citizen can not effectively expatriate now. He will be taxed at the border on any and all wealth held worldwide at the time of exit.

I happen to be a dual US/Canadian citizen, and I have lived in both countries for extended periods, but this law would impoverish the expatriate.

Also I read that, whereas the US has a tax treaty with many nations on just this point to avoid double taxation, now one will pay US taxes no matter where they live.

You are the lawyer. I would love to be proven wrong on either of these points.

Here is where I mentioned the FBAR recently.

I also included a part of it on the GoldMoney page.

Because there are over 200 countries all with unique and rapidly
changing laws therefore I do not think it is GoldMoney’s duty to
apprise customers on the applicable laws in each of those countries.
That would be unmanageable both logistically and economically and
customers can easily and much more efficiently hire legal counsel for
competent advice in their respective country.

I do agree that filing requirements reduce the attractiveness of using
GoldMoney and other offshore banking solutions but that is the fault
of American politicians and neither GoldMoney nor other offshore
banking situations. Like Hitler who demanded Swiss bank account
information from Jews who he then executed; the American politicians
have deliberately and intentionally attempted to make offshore banking
solutions difficult for their citizens and threatened death for those
who resist. Like Hitler and being the first major country to do so
since WWII the US has also implemented exit taxes. But if the FBAR
burden is too high then there is a simple solution: expatriate and
renounce United States citizenship.

There may be another less drastic solution for vaulting physical gold
(which does not need to be reported on the FBAR): http://dassafe.com/

In this case I am intending to define unalienable human rights as fundamental rights which are rights which people can simultaneously claim without forcing anyone else to serve their needs.

For example, everyone can exercise their right to life without forcing anyone to serve their needs. But on the other hand everyone cannot exercise a right to food without forcing another to serve their needs by taking another’s food.

The story is even more complicated than that. When exchanging money for food, that food becomes our property and we can eat it or throw it away. Nobody (except for god) does care. However, if the object purchased is large (like a house, a factory or a big truck), then the rights of the purchaser are limited. For instance when buying a house, we become subject to local taxes (which already indicates that our property rights are limited) and building codes and ordinances. We may not even plant the plants in our backyard which we want. Public law regulates the plants which we can plant legally. All of this indicates that the notion of property rights is not as simple as many think. Definitely, we do not own the currency in our wallet. That is government property on loan in our possession.

The melting of pennies on a large scale would indeed be counterproductive as this activity would rob the economy of small change which in the long term would decrease the efficiency of economic transactions. So the law against melting of US coins does have a rational explanation.

As a matter of habit, I always pick a penny whenever I see one on the street. The benefit of exercising my back by bending down is most likely more valuable in the long run than the penny in copper value which I pick doing so.

Although I agree with many things Trace says, this one is dead wrong. Because you do hurt all others by melting coins… they have to be made again at higher cost. Currency is a common good, so, common interest dictates that laws should prevent the melting of coins, at least in a fiat money system.

Banks then artificially depress the market price of gold by selling it into the market if the price rises. They debase the currency (equitable interests / common shares in the joint venture) by issuing new shares to water down the previously issued shares. This increases the number values of the assets held in the joint venture by ignorant investors. The increase in price hides the fact that the actual value is declining relative to the total value of property held by the joint venture. It hides the fact that new shares are purchasing more private assets, drawing them into the public realm or into the private hands of the privileged. (re- public — to make public).

They then depress the value of public assets of any particular country or political subdivision by using derivatives to move the wealth off shore (See CAFR1.com Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports of all government entities.) which contracts the money supply and cause price deflation.

In the process, they purchase public assets at fire sale prices and re privatize them, thereby obtaining absolute title.

The NEW WORLD ORDER is a bunch of guys who understand banking and law, who use a system of due process to obtain private title to the world’s assets in an attempt to obtain private title to it all. Where there is no public interest (in title), the government has no say. The NWO doesn’t want to allow anyone to have any say in their plans. That’s why they are private.

They did it in Argentina in the 90s (privatizing public assets and purchasing them for pennies on the dollar), and they are doing it here in the USA right now.

Ok, they don’t think anything of killing people either. If they own all the assets, why should they use their assets to feed useless eaters? You know, the ones, those people that they don’t need to run things for them.

Property traded under contract in paper instruments gives the party who issues the paper a presumptive title interest in the property. There may also be an expressed title interest through a mortgage deed.

The purpose of public accounting is to keep track of the equitable interests that the fiduciary title holders of property have in the sovereign’s absolute title to the property. Thus, in the United States now we have fee simple titles to land which has been mortgaged because all the land held under mortgage is held in fee simple, the Bank being holder of the feud. Unencumbered land is held allodially.

Under United States Notes, the (corporate) United States was the holder of the feud. Federal and Feudal are interchangeable terms. Under Federal Reserve Notes, the Federal Reserve is the holder of the feud (the sovereign in other words).

Since the United States no longer issues its own notes, but does so through the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve is the actual issuer, and is therefore the master, or dog wagging the United States as its tail.

That’s why congress was compelled to grant the Fed the bailout money. Congress is held hostage as a mere servant to the Federal Reserve.

Despite the fact that this arrangement was made covertly and is highly fraudulent, on its face it is very legal, and thus enforceable in court, particularly courts whose judges are bought and paid for in script.

Gold and silver would not serve the purpose of being an international exchange medium which allows the banks to control and hold hostage the various countries at will. Gold and silver would promote actual free trade, and in the process free the enslaved people, particularly those who don’t even know they are enslaved.

Gold and silver used as money provides that title to the property which is exchanged for it passes with the transaction because an exchange in substance occurs and actual payment is made. Thus, Gold and silver used as money works to privatize property formerly held by a fiduciary in the public trust, and thus it reduces the quantity of property that is administered by the banks through the various political governments.